Incident and response teams
People who need a disciplined reconstruction after an AI-related event or disputed outcome.
A proportionate technical-forensic audit for organisations that need to understand a disputed outcome, incident or control question across systems, evidence sources and jurisdictions.
Commercial terms
USD 5,000 per month
You may choose not to renew the following month. No minimum commitment.
Request the auditWho this is for
People who need a disciplined reconstruction after an AI-related event or disputed outcome.
Teams coordinating technical facts, chain of custody questions and cross-border stakeholders.
System and security owners who need to understand evidence gaps, dependencies and control changes.
Questions this addresses
Events, system states, human interventions and external dependencies are recorded in separate places.
Logs, exports, model versions and access records lack a shared account of origin, integrity and relevance.
Evidence, custodians, data locations and applicable processes span more than one jurisdiction.
What we examine
A defined question or event, its time window, systems involved and the decisions that need to be supported.
Logs, audit trails, tickets, model and data versions, configurations, access records and relevant communications.
Collection assumptions, timestamps, transformations, access controls and gaps that affect interpretation.
Locations, custodians and cross-border dependencies that are explicitly included or left outside scope.
What you receive
A reasoned sequence of relevant events, system states, actions and known uncertainties.
A register describing reviewed sources, handling assumptions, missing material and confidence boundaries.
A bounded report connecting findings to the evidence reviewed and separating observation from inference.
What success looks like
Relevant stakeholders can follow how the account was assembled and where the record remains incomplete.
Material findings point back to identified sources, transformations and stated limitations.
The organisation can prioritise preservation, further collection, control changes or specialist advice.
Cross-border perimeter
Teams, providers, users and evidence locations across borders are listed rather than treated as interchangeable.
Language, records, roles and jurisdiction-specific questions are separated from common control themes.
Limits and dependencies
The report is limited by the records, custodians, systems and collection permissions made available.
A technical reconstruction distinguishes observed facts, reasonable inferences and unresolved alternatives.
Cross-border context is documented for scoping; legal strategy, privilege and admissibility require the relevant counsel.
Engagement levels
A first, bounded review of roles, evidence and open questions. It identifies what to clarify; it is not assurance, an audit or a certification.
An evidence-led conclusion for the agreed scope, evidence date and criteria. It does not create a universal compliance conclusion.
A more formal examination of agreed criteria, records and controls. The audit scope, method and reporting basis are set in the engagement letter.
Certification is a separate route performed by an appropriate certification body. This service does not issue a certificate or replace that body’s process.
Scope note
This is a scoped technical-forensic review, not a universal finding or legal opinion. Any conclusion is limited to the evidence, time window, systems and jurisdictions expressly agreed.
Official contacts
Maison Sasson ltd - United Kingdom