Cross-border technical-forensic audit / evidence reconstruction

Cross-Border Technical-Forensic Audit

A proportionate technical-forensic audit for organisations that need to understand a disputed outcome, incident or control question across systems, evidence sources and jurisdictions.

What we examine
Request a technical-forensic auditBegin with a pre-assessment

Commercial terms

USD 5,000 per month

You may choose not to renew the following month. No minimum commitment.

Request the audit

Who this is for

Incident and response teams

People who need a disciplined reconstruction after an AI-related event or disputed outcome.

Legal and governance teams

Teams coordinating technical facts, chain of custody questions and cross-border stakeholders.

Technology owners

System and security owners who need to understand evidence gaps, dependencies and control changes.

Questions this addresses

Unclear sequence

Events, system states, human interventions and external dependencies are recorded in separate places.

Uncertain provenance

Logs, exports, model versions and access records lack a shared account of origin, integrity and relevance.

Cross-border friction

Evidence, custodians, data locations and applicable processes span more than one jurisdiction.

What we examine

Forensic question

A defined question or event, its time window, systems involved and the decisions that need to be supported.

Evidence sources

Logs, audit trails, tickets, model and data versions, configurations, access records and relevant communications.

Integrity and handling

Collection assumptions, timestamps, transformations, access controls and gaps that affect interpretation.

Jurisdiction perimeter

Locations, custodians and cross-border dependencies that are explicitly included or left outside scope.

What you receive

Evidence-led timeline

A reasoned sequence of relevant events, system states, actions and known uncertainties.

Source and gap register

A register describing reviewed sources, handling assumptions, missing material and confidence boundaries.

Technical-forensic report

A bounded report connecting findings to the evidence reviewed and separating observation from inference.

What success looks like

Reconstructable account

Relevant stakeholders can follow how the account was assembled and where the record remains incomplete.

Traceable findings

Material findings point back to identified sources, transformations and stated limitations.

Actionable next step

The organisation can prioritise preservation, further collection, control changes or specialist advice.

Cross-border perimeter

Operating footprint

Teams, providers, users and evidence locations across borders are listed rather than treated as interchangeable.

Local questions remain visible

Language, records, roles and jurisdiction-specific questions are separated from common control themes.

Limits and dependencies

Access shapes the result

The report is limited by the records, custodians, systems and collection permissions made available.

Inference stays labelled

A technical reconstruction distinguishes observed facts, reasonable inferences and unresolved alternatives.

Technical work is not legal advice

Cross-border context is documented for scoping; legal strategy, privilege and admissibility require the relevant counsel.

Engagement levels

Readiness review

A first, bounded review of roles, evidence and open questions. It identifies what to clarify; it is not assurance, an audit or a certification.

Assurance

An evidence-led conclusion for the agreed scope, evidence date and criteria. It does not create a universal compliance conclusion.

Audit

A more formal examination of agreed criteria, records and controls. The audit scope, method and reporting basis are set in the engagement letter.

Certification

Certification is a separate route performed by an appropriate certification body. This service does not issue a certificate or replace that body’s process.

Scope note

This is a scoped technical-forensic review, not a universal finding or legal opinion. Any conclusion is limited to the evidence, time window, systems and jurisdictions expressly agreed.

Official contacts

Maison Sasson ltd - United Kingdom

Email: info@ai-eu-act.xyzWhatsApp: +393381639136Legal entity: Maison Sasson ltd - United Kingdom